Yes, that is how I read it now too.
> On 11 Sep 2018, at 14:55, Erik Stel <erik.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sven,
>
> According to the spec "0" or invalid date formats should mean 'isExpired'
> (as you already suggested):
> A cache recipient MUST interpret invalid date formats, especially the
> value "0", as representing a time in the past (i.e., "already
> expired").
>
> So I would vote for having 'isExpired' answer 'true' in those cases. Having
> 'expiresTimeStamp' throw an error seems reasonable. The sender can catch the
> exception.
>
> Cheers,
> Erik
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
>
