Hi, > On 7 Jul 2018, at 17:18, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > > > >> Am 07.07.2018 um 17:08 schrieb Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Le 07/07/2018 à 16:17, Ben Coman a écrit : >>> Any seeming agreement may just have been the nay-sayers falling silent since >>> there seemed little chance of having it changed when it came as a >>> done-deal with Nautilus. >>> Personally I tried to conform to using the double-sequence-shortcuts >>> but could never get over the cumbersome feel of it, >>> to the point where in Nautlius I actually stopped using shortcuts and >>> reverted to using context menus. >>> >>> I guess lovers of the double-sequence-shortcuts are now in that boat. >>> I'm not sure there was much discussion around Calypso using >>> single-key-shortcuts. >>> But I'm personally very happy with this behaviour change introduced by >>> Nautlius was reverted. >>> I'm glad to using shortcuts in the System Browser again. >>> >> For my part I'm not because before I could delete/rename/add a >> package/class/protocol/method without the mouse
Yes, but it was not working properly nor everywhere. >> but now it became much >> harder with simple key shortcut since it works only on the focused pane. Now in calypso you have cmd+/ who will show you an spotter with all options. You can then select the command you look for. I do not use mouse when using calypso thanks to this addition. In general, while it requires some time to get used to it (and some options needs renames, etc. to make a better experience) is a lot more powerful than shortcuts (because let’s be realistic there will be always more options than shortcuts available), and makes commands easier to find/learn. Another thing is that we still need to find which commands deserve a shortcut anyway :) >> >> But I guess this kind of things depend on everyone. >> >> Maybe it could be good to be able to customize it via settings. >> > I don‘t understand anyway why keyboard shortcuts are dependent on a tool. > Shouldn‘t there be an abstraction mapping between action and shortcut? Because tools as most of the system was badly designed, without a central vision and without and it evolved (mutated?) without any control. This is changing, but as always iterative development means we cannot just throw everything and start over (something I dream to do, but this will also bring new problems so… :P) Cheers, Esteban > > Norbert >>> cheers -ben >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cyril Ferlicot >> https://ferlicot.fr <https://ferlicot.fr/>
