Matias

 

Thanks for the hints. I now have 5 greens, but all the rest are red. I am
still getting the 'File cannot be locked' message. Are you doing better than
that? I may try a few trials using it for real, rather than the test suite.

 

Thanks again

 

Peter Kenny

 

From: Pharo-users <pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org> On Behalf Of Matias
Maretto
Sent: 22 June 2018 22:54
To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] OmniBase for Pharo 6

 

Hi Peter, yes I had the same error at the beginning. I have done 2 minor
changes. Now it seems to be working fine (Although I am still running more
tests). Here: 

 

ODBWin32FileStream >> 

closeHandle: aHandle

"Close an open Win32 object handle, freeing any resources held by it.

Once closed a handle is no longer valid. Answer whether the function

succeeds.

See Win32 SDK help for more information.

 

BOOL CloseHandle(

HANDLE  hObject 

// handle of object to close  

);"

 

"<apicall: ulong 'CloseHandle' (long) module:'kernel32.dll'>"

^ self ffiCall: #(ulong CloseHandle(long aHandle))

 

 

 

ODBWin32FileStream >> 

lockFile: aHandle offsetLow: loPos offsetHigh: hiPos lengthLow: loLength
lengthHigh: hiLength

"<apicall: long 'LockFile' (long ulong ulong ulong ulong) module:
'kernel32.dll'>"

 

^ self

ffiCall: #(long LockFile #(long aHandle , ulong loPos , ulong hiPos , ulong
loLength , ulong hiLength))

 

 

 

  _____  

De: Pharo-users <pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org
<mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org> > en nombre de PBKResearch
<pe...@pbkresearch.co.uk <mailto:pe...@pbkresearch.co.uk> >
Enviado: viernes, 22 de junio de 2018 09:45 p. m.
Para: 'Any question about pharo is welcome'
Asunto: Re: [Pharo-users] OmniBase for Pharo 6 

 

Matias

 

I have just loaded Esteban's package in a new Pharo 6.1 under Windows 10. I
get an error message saying 'File cannot be locked. Try again?'. When I
select 'no', all tests are run and give red. Are you still running on win 7?
If so, I must be doing something wrong. Can you give more details of the FFI
corrections you made, please?

 

Many thanks

 

Peter Kenny

 

From: Pharo-users <pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org
<mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org> > On Behalf Of Matias Maretto
Sent: 22 June 2018 21:07
To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
<mailto:pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> >
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] OmniBase for Pharo 6

 

Esteban: it's working fine, I had to made a minor corrections on 2 FFI calls
and now everithing seems to be working fine.

For What I saw with Voyage-UnqLite only String Objects can be used to
searilize; Omnibase allow to persist almost any kind of objects, thats the
part I like about it. 

 

 

 

  _____  

De: Pharo-users <pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org
<mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org> > en nombre de Esteban
Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com <mailto:esteba...@gmail.com> >
Enviado: jueves, 21 de junio de 2018 08:19 p. m.
Para: Any question about pharo is welcome
Asunto: Re: [Pharo-users] OmniBase for Pharo 6 

 

I did it manually and I took like 5 min :P
but this was really easy, just a bunch of FFI calls.

Esteban

> On 21 Jun 2018, at 15:31, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com
<mailto:s...@clipperadams.com> > wrote:
> 
> EstebanLM wrote
>> I just made a "blind port". migrated the old FFI to new UFFI
> 
> Did you do this manually or use some migration tool? How long did it take?
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html 


 <http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html> Smalltalk -
Pharo Smalltalk Users | Mailing List Archive

forum.world.st

Pharo Smalltalk Users forum and mailing list archive. Pharo User Forum



> 

Reply via email to