Hi,

I have found a simple workaround (not yet the final solution):

Please check:

        https://tracker.pharo.org/issues-register-service

> On 15 Jun 2018, at 13:56, Tim Mackinnon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I think Let’s Encrypt can be your friend (that seems to be the instructions 
> all of the providers give - e.g. 
> https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-secure-nginx-with-let-s-encrypt-on-ubuntu-16-04
>  
> <https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-secure-nginx-with-let-s-encrypt-on-ubuntu-16-04>).
> 
> Alternatively - and this applies more to Pharo.org <http://pharo.org/> - why 
> not stick it on Netlify (https://www.netlify.com/docs/welcome/ 
> <https://www.netlify.com/docs/welcome/>) which does https for you. I was 
> amazed how much it does by checking your site off git and even offers some 
> dynamic hooks too.
> 
> I am still sizing up porting my metalsmith generated site to something pillar 
> based - but the concept is the same and depending on how you do things, it 
> might be quite trivial.
> 
> Tim
> 
>> On 15 Jun 2018, at 10:15, Marcus Denker <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> yes, we really need to setup SSL for that server. I will have a look next 
>> week.
>> 
>>> On 13 Jun 2018, at 10:25, Manuel Leuenberger <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I announced my concerns on Discord already, but got no reaction, so I post 
>>> it here as well to have it properly archived.
>>> 
>>> "A colleague just noticed that the registration for the issue tracker is 
>>> HTTP-only. This is not an appropriate choice for sensitive data like a 
>>> password. Any possibilities to make this HTTPS-only?
>>> Link: http://tracker.pharo.org/issues-register-service 
>>> <http://tracker.pharo.org/issues-register-service>, setting https:// 
>>> manually does not work"
>>> 
>>> From my perspective this is a serious problem that should be quickly 
>>> addressed, it's not just a nice to have feature. Not treating sensitive 
>>> data with proper care leaves an image of not caring about user security and 
>>> looks unprofessional. I don't think that is what Pharo needs.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Manuel
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to