On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Hilaire <hila...@drgeo.eu> wrote: > Hi, > > Out of curiosity. > > I always found the #min:max: confusing and lost in its expressiveness. > > One should write: > > 10 min: 48 max: 12
I do not understand the result :) To me this method is illnamed. > > to expect 12. > > but logically one (at least me) may want to express it as: > > 10 min: 12 max: 48 > > Then when reading its source code, it is even more confusing: > > min: aMin max: aMax > ^ (self min: aMin) max: aMax > > Are not the argument names inversed in their meaning, if any? > > Hilaire > > -- > Dr. Geo > http://drgeo.eu > > >
