Maybe I’m missing something, or maybe I’m not ‘everyone’, but I’ve only had a few problems with 32 bit Pharo 7 and Windows. Btw Windows 10 “64 bit” is about as 64 bit as Windows 95 was 32 bit. i.e. not very. Most of the issues center around Moose, not the core Pharo. But I’m only playing with Pharo 7, mainly on Linux where the latest image seems pretty stable. My actual development is still on 61 (and in one case, 5.0 since it requires the old FFI).
M$ is supposed to fix the remains of 32 bit Windows next year, but we all know what ‘next year’ means to Microsoft, it’s forever ‘next year’. As far as I understood, most of the development of Pharo 7 is focused on the 64 bit version in any case. What’s missing from 61 that you absolutely have to have ATM? Andrew From: Benoit St-Jean <bstj...@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 5:26 AM To: Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Where do we go now ? BTW, why put an .exe installer for Windows available when it crashes right from the start? It just doesn't work at all. Period. For everyone. And I thought looking for senders of a method was something we mastered a long time ago, like starting with Smalltalk-76. Am I supposed to assume that everything, even basic functionalities, are all broken because it's labeled "alpha" ? ----------------- Benoît St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean Instagram: Chef_Benito IRC: lamneth Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein) On Friday, April 13, 2018, 5:20:28 a.m. EDT, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com <mailto:esteba...@gmail.com> > wrote: On 13 Apr 2018, at 11:07, Benoit St-Jean <bstj...@yahoo.com <mailto:bstj...@yahoo.com> > wrote: I'm on Windows 10, using Pharo 7.0 alpha 32 bit. and btw… which part of ALPHA you do not get? Esteban
