Guillermo Polito wrote > I've done also some profiling and it does not look like we've lost in > performance either (reading and decoding a 35MB file):
Your 1st (new API) example: "0:00:00:01.535" Your 2nd (old API) example:"0:00:00:01.732" *** but *** Your 1st (new API) example using the same consuming selector as example #1 (#upToEnd): "0:00:00:07.816" or 4.5x slower ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
