That can be an option.

Doru


> On Mar 19, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> So I imagine something like the following
> 
> spotterFieldsFor: aStep
>       <spotterOrder: 20>
>       ^ aStep listProcessor
>               title: 'Fields';
>               canDiveIn: [ false "or some dynamic condition" ];
>               ...
> 
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Certainly.
> 
> Basically I want to avoid a situation, where diving in would result in an 
> empty spotter:
> 
> <image.png>
> 
> <image.png>
> 
> 
> So instead I would like to remove the dive in capability (both the icon, and 
> the action), when the result will be empty. (And of course keep it if there 
> will be something).
> 
> Ideally it should be possible to define it in the "parent" step, because 
> sometimes I know there will be no further steps, and sometimes the result is 
> simply empty (in which case I might still want to show that there are zero 
> children).
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter
> 
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am not sure I understand the issue. Can you re-explain it please?
> 
> Cheers,
> Doru
> 
> 
> > On Mar 16, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > correction:  spotterForRenderingShapesFor: is not in Pharo 6.1 (it's added 
> > by Roassal2GT)
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is it possible to disable GTSpotter dive in functionality when the result 
> > would be empty?
> >
> > I've tried looking at GTSpotterStep>>canDiveIn: but it seems that no matter 
> > what there will be at least one processor (at least the "parent" one, which 
> > is weird).
> >
> > Also there are two spotter extensions directly on Object (Pharo 6.1)
> > * spotterForRenderingShapesFor:
> > * spotterRePropertiesFor:
> >
> > which are always applied... but canDiveIn: was returing true even when I 
> > disabled them.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peter
> >
> 
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
> 
> "Obvious things are difficult to teach."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

“The smaller and more pervasive the hardware becomes, the more physical the 
software gets."


Reply via email to