That can be an option. Doru
> On Mar 19, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So I imagine something like the following > > spotterFieldsFor: aStep > <spotterOrder: 20> > ^ aStep listProcessor > title: 'Fields'; > canDiveIn: [ false "or some dynamic condition" ]; > ... > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Certainly. > > Basically I want to avoid a situation, where diving in would result in an > empty spotter: > > <image.png> > > <image.png> > > > So instead I would like to remove the dive in capability (both the icon, and > the action), when the result will be empty. (And of course keep it if there > will be something). > > Ideally it should be possible to define it in the "parent" step, because > sometimes I know there will be no further steps, and sometimes the result is > simply empty (in which case I might still want to show that there are zero > children). > > Thanks, > Peter > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:01 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure I understand the issue. Can you re-explain it please? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > On Mar 16, 2018, at 8:02 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > correction: spotterForRenderingShapesFor: is not in Pharo 6.1 (it's added > > by Roassal2GT) > > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is it possible to disable GTSpotter dive in functionality when the result > > would be empty? > > > > I've tried looking at GTSpotterStep>>canDiveIn: but it seems that no matter > > what there will be at least one processor (at least the "parent" one, which > > is weird). > > > > Also there are two spotter extensions directly on Object (Pharo 6.1) > > * spotterForRenderingShapesFor: > > * spotterRePropertiesFor: > > > > which are always applied... but canDiveIn: was returing true even when I > > disabled them. > > > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "Obvious things are difficult to teach." > > > > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com “The smaller and more pervasive the hardware becomes, the more physical the software gets."