thx for looking into this. half way there ;) do you have the Pharo build numbers that match these Nautilus versions?
cheers -ben On 9 March 2018 at 14:30, Siemen Baader <siemenbaa...@gmail.com> wrote: > The regression happens between Nautilus-TheIntegrator1352.mcz and > Nautilus-TheIntegrator1351.mcz. Pharo 6.0 uses > Nautilus-TheIntegrator1366.mcz > > I'll look more to find the actual code that breaks. > > -- Siemen > > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Siemen Baader <siemenbaa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Stef, >> >> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Stephane Ducasse < >> stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Siemen >>> >>> I use often cmd-L too and may be we got a regression. >>> >> >> I'm pretty sure I started doing it after I saw you do it in the MOOC ;) >> >> And indeed I have the same behavior in Pharo 70. >>> Can you try to see how to address it? >>> >> >> Yes, I can try to look into it. I don't have any clear idea where to >> start other than browsing Nautilus code and perhaps uses of >> NautilusChanged, but perhaps it is not that hard to find. >> >> -- Siemen >> >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Siemen Baader <siemenbaa...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I downloaded Pharo 6.1 for OSX and whenever I revert changes in >>> Nautilus >>> > with CMD-L, the content is reverted and the orange dirty marker >>> triangle >>> > disappears. But when I switch to a different method, Nautilus shows the >>> > 'Content has been modified. What do you want to do?' dialog, as it only >>> > should when content is actually different. >>> > >>> > I use this all the time, I can't imagine I'm the only one, but I >>> couldn't >>> > find the problem mentioned anywhere. Does anyone else have it? What to >>> do? >>> > >>> > -- Siemen >>> >>> >> >
