On 22 November 2017 at 01:07, Alistair Grant <akgrant0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20 November 2017 at 09:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > > > > We can discuss about this ad infinitum. I think we all agree that > > there are 2 views (abstract calendar date and concrete time > > interval/span, which requires a TZ), as well as 2 possible ways to > > deal with the second case (TZ inside date or as context outside of the > > date). > > > Right, I think changing things now will be quite a bit of work. > > However there are a couple of things we can do to make life a bit easier: > > 1. Add a method that facilitates TZ independent comparisons. > 2. Add a bit more information in the class comments. > > > I've named the method #dmyEquals: below, although I don't particularly > like it. If anyone has a better idea, please reply. > how about #localEquals: i.e. local ==> ignore timezones btw, now we should move to discuss the default date format? https://xkcd.com/1179/ \ ;)-ben== /
