2017-11-15 11:08 GMT+01:00 Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com>:
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-15 11:00 GMT+01:00 Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> And just putting it back to gray? As "not run"?
>>>
>>
>> We can implement any logic.
>> Personally I need current behaviour.
>>
>
> But it is not about you personally. It is about implementing the most
> common and the less strange for newcomers.
>

To know what is the most common case people should tell personal opinion.
And in this thread only Richard was against current logic.


>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2017-11-15 1:49 GMT+01:00 Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Ben Coman wrote
>>>>> > Or it could go to Amber, half-way between green & red to mean
>>>>> probably
>>>>> > correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ha ha.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, it seems that just automatically rerunning the test immediately
>>>>> after
>>>>> a human-manipulated run and setting the color based on that second run
>>>>> addresses all points on both sides, no?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Except that sometimes we are debugging slow test and running it second
>>>> time automatically after "proceed" can be not appropriate.
>>>> We are talking about single test run. If user have any doubts about
>>>> result It is his responsibility to rerun the test. User knows what he is
>>>> doing when he debug and fix the test. No intelligence is required here.
>>>>
>>>> And anyway current fix just provides consistent behaviour to debugging
>>>> from explicit breakpoint/halt. In that case the result was always in sync
>>>> with debug session.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Sean
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Guille Polito
>>>
>>> Research Engineer
>>>
>>> Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
>>>
>>> CRIStAL - UMR 9189
>>>
>>> French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr
>>> <http://www.cnrs.fr>*
>>>
>>>
>>> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io>
>>>
>>> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13 <+33%206%2052%2070%2066%2013>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Guille Polito
>
> Research Engineer
>
> Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
>
> CRIStAL - UMR 9189
>
> French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr
> <http://www.cnrs.fr>*
>
>
> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io>
>
> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13 <+33%206%2052%2070%2066%2013>
>

Reply via email to