On 8 November 2017 at 16:06, Paulo R. Dellani <dell...@pobox.com> wrote: > You need to configure Iceberg with the path of the SSH key > files you are using to authenticate with gitlab as well as the > passphrase to unlock the private key, I only got it working > after that. Have your done that? > > There is more information in the README/FAQ here: > > https://github.com/pharo-vcs/iceberg
Thanks for pointing this out. I had enough other fires that I'd given up on 64 bit, however it appears to be working now. I'll restart my efforts to move to 64 bit. Cheers, Alistair > Cheers, > > Paulo > > > On 11/08/2017 12:26 AM, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > > Thanks for confirming this Esteban - perhaps I am doing something wrong - I > tried using the steps I was using successfully several months ago namely: > > curl get.pharo.org/64/ | bash > ./pharo-ui Pharo.image > > Which got me the latest image - which sys info says is (not sure why it > still says 6.0 tho?): > > Pharo 6.0 > Latest update: #60520 > > I then open Iceberg, and click on Clone Repository > > In the dialog I enter: > > g...@gitlab.com:macta/PharoLambda.git > And put src in the code subdirectory field, and then click on Create. > > I get the LGit_GIT_ERROR ??? > > Hmm, out of curiosity, I just tried leaving the src field empty and it then > seemed to put an entry into Iceberg but then a Fetch gave me the same error? > > Tim > > On 7 Nov 2017, at 11:46, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > iceberg should work on 64bits, both on Pharo7 and Pharo6. > I’ve been using it exclusively on 64bits since some months now and I know > I’m not the only one… can you send a way to reproduce your problem so I can > take a look? > > Esteban > > > On 6 Nov 2017, at 12:11, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote: > > Hi - does Iceberg work on a 64bit image yet? I’ve not tried in a while, and > was surprised when I went to get a new image via the command line that I am > getting the error: LGit_GIT_ERROR: Invalid version 0 on git_remote_callbacks > > I can see a post by Alistair in Jun asking about this, and it seems 64bit > hadn’t been updated to work back then - but is this still true in Nov? > > We seem very much in turmoil at the moment - and its unclear what should > work and not work. Is there a stable platform? If 64 bit is only working for > 7.x - should we remove it from 6.x so that people don’t inadvertently try to > use it? > > Tim
