Hi I do not see why these classes would be mandatory for a workflow. There seems to be left over from the extraction.
stef On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ok for now publish your changes on smalltalkhub somewhere so that they >> do not stay on your machine. > > Even if very very experimental :) > > I’ll do. Just need a bit more work and comment what I did. > > I have unsolved references to this classes too. > DomBuilder > IDBasicManager > IDCurrentManager > > Any ideas ? > I’ll read more carefully the white paper and see if XMLParser can help here. > But is someone knows about this classes… > > Cheers, > > Cédrick > > > >> >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Did you send pull requests? >>> >>> Euh, actually I still don’t really know how to use git. >>> >>> I loaded it through metacello. Can I simply a sunlit code that way ? >>> >>> The code is quite documented already and there are tests. >>> >>> I kind of fixed some tests but not sure this was the way to do so >>> (beginHistory has no action for instance). >>> >>> All the xpdl import/export fail but this is due to one method that need a >>> DOMbuilder and two other class I have no clue. >>> >>> And I still haven’t find how to execute a process ^^ >>> >>> I’ll have another look today. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Cédrick >>> >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> A pleasure to discover ! To me, a wonderful(ly engineered) library. >>>>> >>>>> Big thanks to Netstyle ! >>>>> >>>>> I’m just getting my hands around, but it looks to me like a great general >>>>> purpose BP tool (modeling + engine + xpdl import export). >>>>> It would be very useful for IS in industrial contexts (*). And before all >>>>> a superb starting point to model my simple personal routines as >>>>> executable processes. >>>>> >>>>> On the practical aspects, just a problem loading because of >>>>> WADynamicVariable, but it kinds of load on Pharo 6. >>>>> Running tests, there are (naturally) some failures. I think most come >>>>> from the removed links to Omnibase/History support and seaside >>>>> (WADynamicVariable). >>>>> >>>>> Some stuffs that are missing: >>>>> #isOmniBaseTransaction >>>>> #markDirty >>>>> A reference to TimeStamp fixed: >>>>> #beginInHistory >>>>> … >>>>> >>>>> Need to fix WADynamicVariable with shouldn’t be hard. >>>>> The History link (persistence) is a bit more difficult as I don’t know >>>>> its importance in the engine. >>>>> All Workflow object are managed object which (if I understand well) are >>>>> persistent object. So maybe It need a (local) persistent alternative, a >>>>> stub ? >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, I need to understand more and I will probably come back with some >>>>> questions about the dependencies and how to fix them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers and thanks again, enligthening code :) >>>>> >>>>> Cédrick >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * Interoperability of is a field I try carefully not to enter because I >>>>> found not really fun (as most of the tool I’ve soon were java based … and >>>>> slow… and java world !) but if only I had similar tools in pharo that >>>>> could bring the fun back :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Le 27 oct. 2017 à 09:37, Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> I thons this just perfect as a starting point ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Cedrick >>>>>> >>>>>> Envoyé de mon iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 26 oct. 2017 à 19:38, Paul DeBruicker <pdebr...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe the package described here has what you're looking for : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://forum.world.st/Ann-Workflow-td4963635.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cédrick Béler wrote >>>>>>>> Hi again, this is my last question and the more general one of the day >>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I’m looking for way of representing and executing simple "business >>>>>>>> processes" in Pharo and a way of declaring domain >>>>>>>> ontologies/taxonomies. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I didn’t find any lib around this subjects except some projects in >>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>> smalltalk dialects. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just wander if somebody has done some work in these field. I’m also >>>>>>>> interested in (KISS) design discussions around these topics, hence this >>>>>>>> email. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don’t want to do a full fledged business process middleware. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would need : >>>>>>>> - a way to represent simple business processes (succession of >>>>>>>> activities >>>>>>>> with logic gates (and/or/xor) => I might be able to do that by myself). >>>>>>>> - a way to execute these processes (routines) in a semi-aotumatic >>>>>>>> manner >>>>>>>> => This looks more difficult to do to me. >>>>>>>> => my aim is to execute recurrent routines (my routines) with the help >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> a Pharo application >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For such a system, I also need a way to categorize information context. >>>>>>>> Again, I don’t think I need a full fledged ontology implementation like >>>>>>>> Description Logic (or whatever). I think I’ll be happy with information >>>>>>>> tagging according to a predefined taxonomy. Instead of flat tags, I’d >>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>> them to implement some sort of multiple inheritance. For instance, I >>>>>>>> may >>>>>>>> need a tag #soccer that "inherit" #sport. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any information regarding taxonomy tagging in Pharo ? (Or eventually >>>>>>>> ontology?). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> TIA, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cédrick >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
