Attila Magyar wrote > Teapot already supports conditional routes, maybe using them instead of > adding the WS: message would be better. > > I'm thinking domething like: > > Teapot on > GET: '/chat' -> whatever; when: [:req | req isWebSocket]; > start. > > or just > > Teapot on > GET: '/chat' -> whatever; when: #isWebSocket > start. > > I'll play with this idea sometime. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
I've played a little bit with this: GET: '/chat' -> [:req | Teapot forward: aReq toWebSocket: '/chat' ]; when: ... The class method of Teapot does the "ZnWebSocketDelegate map: ... to... " thing. It could handle the instances of the delegate per url. Don't know it this matches the Teapot philosophy, it was just another variant to play with. Cheers Hans -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
