Normally, it should be possible. Libusb can be compiled for 64bits architectures. I don’t know if it changes something in the UFFI binding side?
Julien > Le 12 oct. 2017 à 14:41, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Very cool. Would that be doable to adapt for a 64bits version? > > Thierry > > 2017-10-12 13:29 GMT+02:00 Julien <julien.delplan...@inria.fr > <mailto:julien.delplan...@inria.fr>>: > Hello, > > A bit late, there is a Libusb [1] binding (using UFFI) and support for the > Human Interface Device [2] (that uses the binding but is written in pure > Smalltalk) for Pharo. > > Everything is on the github repository [3]. « Install » and « Quick start » > sections give you all you need to start using the project. > > One could also have a look at the wiki [4]. > > It works on Linux but hasn’t been tested on Mac OS nor Windows (it should > work since libusb library works on these platforms). > > Do not forget to install the 32 bits versions of libusb on your computer. > > The purpose of this library is to provide the ability to use USB devices > directly from Pharo. > > For example, one could get data from a PS3 controller, a mouse, a keyboard, > an Arduino device, etc… > > Cheers, > > Julien > > PS: I realised this project during an internship in TaMère SCRL company [5]. > Thanks to them! > > Links: > [1]: http://libusb.info <http://libusb.info/> > [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_interface_device > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_interface_device> > [3]: https://github.com/tamerescrl/libusb-pharo > <https://github.com/tamerescrl/libusb-pharo> > [4]: https://github.com/tamerescrl/libusb-pharo/wiki > <https://github.com/tamerescrl/libusb-pharo/wiki> > [5]: http://tamere.eu <http://tamere.eu/>
