+1 to "recursive" 2017-09-22 11:05 GMT+02:00 Hilaire <hila...@drgeo.eu>:
> I am just stating the neutral term to describe GPL license nature is > "recursive", and why it was designed as this. The "viral" term is > unnecessary emotionally charged. > > I don't fell the discussion turned about MIT vs GPL, Pharo been MIT is > just fine. > > Hilaire > > Le 22/09/2017 à 10:40, Thierry Goubier a écrit : > >> >> The appropriate and neutral term to describe GPL licence is >> "recursive". >> >> GPL licence was designed to build a better computing community, >> where freedom is 1st consideration, even at the expense of a lower >> acceptance. >> >> >> And the little technical fact that you can't link code in the Smalltalk >> world, only create a derivative work, has nothing to do with the community >> stance on MIT versus GPL. >> >> > -- > Dr. Geo > http://drgeo.eu > > > >
