On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 02:47:16AM +0200, stephan wrote: > On 16-09-17 18:51, Peter Uhnák wrote: > > This is the reason why LGPL exists. LGPL is not contagious. > > It is not clear that that would be the case with smalltalk. > We tend to reuse by subclassing, and linking is not so > well-defined. There is no license that has the same effect as > LGPL has for c programs for smalltalk.
The Common Lisp people have LLGPL: http://www.cliki.net/LLGPL http://opensource.franz.com/preamble.html Pierce
