--- Begin Message ---
Hi Stephane,

thanks for that kind reply! No problem!
I'm unfortunately not too deep into Pharo, but maybe I can help with
the packaging / build process for the Linux downloads (at least my
Linux knowledge is far better than my Pharo knowledge ;-))?

Best regards,
Marc

2017-07-05 8:00 GMT+02:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>:
> Hi marc
>
> We are a bit under water in this moment making sure that we can handle
> pull requests for Pharo 70.
> I'm sure that it will get better in the future.
> Esteban is moving, we got many articles to send, clement hand it in its phd 
> :).
> And many more.
>
> So we are sorry about the support.
>
> Stef
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Marc Hanisch via Pharo-users
> <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Hanisch <marc.hani...@googlemail.com>
>> To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:14:52 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo6.0 for linux and PharoV60.sources location
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> Yes, that was me. Unfortunately I did not get an answer. I solved this by 
>> copying the sources file into the location where Pharo is looking for it.
>>
>> Due to the missing sources file, variables and arguments got renamed 
>> automatically...
>>
>> I still don't understand why the sources file is spread 3 or 4 times across 
>> the directory structure...
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Marc
>>
>> Am 03.07.2017 12:16 schrieb "Andreas Sunardi" <a.suna...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Pardon me if this has been discussed before. I seem to recall somebody ran 
>>> into this issue or related to this, but I don't remember what the solution 
>>> was, if there was any.
>>>
>>> The linux Pharo 6 download package from Pharo web site has different VM 
>>> directory structure than Pharo 5. The PharoV60.sources file is not located 
>>> in the same directory as the VM binary. As a result, if user has image + 
>>> changes files in another directory, Pharo always gives notification that 
>>> the sources file is not found. This is not so with the Pharo 5.
>>>
>>> In most cases, it's just a notification, but in the past I've run into an 
>>> error in debugging session when I tried to look into a method because of 
>>> missing sources file.
>>>
>>> Can this be corrected or is it expected for the user to manage sources file 
>>> where about? I'm hoping a correction or clarification would at least 
>>> benefit new comers.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>>
>>
>


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to