> On 17 May 2017, at 15:11, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 17/05/2017 14:55, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >> >> The use of #stonAllInstVarNames works in limiting what you write out (there >> is even a unit test based on STONTestUser3). >> >> But you seem to want to do something else, you want to write the others ones >> out in a different way. >> >> What I tried to explain is that that is generally not needed, if you >> customise the value of #variableToCustomise (that is one level deeper). This >> is what I did in the example. >> >> Since you can't or won't explain your use case better, I really can't help, >> can I ? >> >> > > I don't really have the time right now but later I'll try to write a > simple example.
OK. But don't go too far in writing actual code. I want to understand the use case at a high level (like how you started), then I can try to find how/if STON can do what you want. Right now, you are already too deep into a possible solution. > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr > > http://www.synectique.eu > 2 rue Jacques Prévert 01, > 59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France >