yes we should!
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Serge Stinckwich < serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes this what I was going to answer as well. Matrix in Pharo does not > implement the usual mathematical operators like PMMatrix. > Maybe should be rename as Array2D in order to avoid confusion in the > future. > > Regards, > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Stephane Ducasse > <stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > the matrix class is not really a matrix more a 2dArray > > no eigen values and the rest > > > > stef > > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:04 PM, frankl1_miky < > mike1corporat...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> Polymath come with PMMatrix class . what is the difference between > this > >> class and the native Matrix class. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://forum.world.st/PMMatrix-vs-Matrix-tp4943819.html > >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > > > > > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UCN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/ > >
