Hi Jimmie,
Le 29/03/2017 à 20:07, Jimmie Houchin a écrit :
What I don't understand from this thread, and my apologies if it was
expressed. But to me the question is not what or why happened in the
past. Rather what is the way to proceed ahead with a single canonical
source. This is what will benefit the community. What and where is that
source.
I don't know.
I will probably update the github repo by backporting the changes I'm
interested in from the smalltalkhub repo, when I'll get the time to do
it. There is little pressure to do so: both versions work perfectly well
for its usual users, and they are close enough that documentation is the
same for both.
Tracking changes on the smalltalkhub repo is inconvenient, to say the
least: this thing never sends anything to any watcher, to the difference
of github, so you can't track anything about updates appearing there. On
github, you can subscribe to updates... makes a world of a difference if
you have to track a project.
If you are still using an old parser on the previous SmaCC version
(1.x), you'll have to get yet another SmaCC repository.
Regards,
Thierry
Shalom.
Jimmie Houchin
On 03/29/2017 12:25 PM, Thierry Goubier wrote:
2017-03-29 18:07 GMT+02:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com
<mailto:stepharo.s...@gmail.com>>:
Ok I should say that I do not understand the differences and why
there are two versions of Smacc.
So I will stop maintaining the tutorial because now may be I
should revert what I wrote.
I was too stupid to do it in fact I should focus on my stuff and
nothing else.
This saddens me a lot.
We are a small community and we split ourselves into little chunks.
I do not get why there is no notion of economy and sharing in our
culture.
I also don't know why it was done that way. And I don't want to spend
energy fighting it.
Thierry
Stef
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com
<mailto:tu...@tudorgirba.com>> wrote:
Hi,
> On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Stephane Ducasse
<stepharo.s...@gmail.com <mailto:stepharo.s...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> OK
> I loaded Smacc from github as mentioned by thierry.
>
> Metacello new
> baseline: 'SmaCC';
> repository: 'github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC';
> load
>
> Are there two configurationOfSmacc?
> May be we should only have one no?
>
> I have the impression that even thierry and jason working
heavily with Smacc do not know that.
> And we should not force them to use Moose. At least we do
not have to win
> anything with it.
I did not mean to force anyone to use Moose. I just said it is
already loaded there, in case you use it.
Moose relies on the ConfigurationOfSmaCC maintained by John.
Thierry has another repository that he created before John
moved his work to Pharo. But, now that he does work with Pharo
Moose relies on his version.
Cheers,
Doru
>
> Stef
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Tudor Girba
<tu...@tudorgirba.com <mailto:tu...@tudorgirba.com>> wrote:
> They come with the ConfigurationOfSmaCC which is already in
the Moose image.
>
> Doru
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Stephane Ducasse
<stepharo.s...@gmail.com <mailto:stepharo.s...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > where can I load the Smacc gt extension and debugger
extensions?
> >
> > Stef
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
> www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com>
>
> "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
>
>
>
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
www.feenk.com <http://www.feenk.com>
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking
at them."
