On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote: >> On 09/02/17 17:05, Serge Stinckwich wrote: >>> >>> but all the projects are coming from RMOD team, but having all the >>> projects proposal coming from the same place might be perceived >>> negatively from Google. Can we add more projects from previous gsoc >>> from other people also ? >> >> >> My two earlier proposals are fine, and already on the site. > > Can you reduce the size of the "Distributed Issue Tracker" subject > because there is too much details compared to other subjects.
Sorry I'm late with this feedback... For the "Distributed Issue Tracker" I read "The recent decision by Google to deprecate and stop its API for the Google Issue Tracker" So how recent was this? I thought it was a few years ago when Fogbugz was adopted. This strikes me as a poor presentation of our capability to execute GSoC. For a timely correction, I'd done this... https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-project-proposals/pull/33 Two commits a. No text changes. Inserted new lines to make it more readable in editor. b. Shrunk test of DIT project. cheers -ben
