Hi Stephan, 

> On 10 Feb 2017, at 10:27, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote:
> 
> The past year we have started using Slack to communicate in real-time about 
> Pharo. It has nice (mobile) clients and makes it easy to share pictures and 
> snippets. As a result a large part of the communication about design and how 
> to do things has moved from the mailing lists to Slack. As we're using the 
> free version, and cannot afford to use the commercial version, we have no 
> long-time storage of the design discussions. This contrasts with our mailing 
> lists, that have a long-term archive. There was some discussion about this, 
> and I'm not aware of that resulting in an accessible, easy to access archive. 
> Also, we have not succeeded in summarizing design discussions from slack to 
> the mailing lists. The resulting gap in design information forms an enormous 
> long-term risk for our community. Without the design discussions it is much 
> more difficult to later understand why decisions were taken. We cannot afford 
> to let this short-term ease-of-use destroy Pharo's community history, and 
> thereby Pharo. Let us fix this.

I share many of what you say… but in the other point of view, Slack as really 
worked and there is a lot more happening now in Slack + mailing list than what 
was before just in mailing list. 
But most of that is lost because of Slack policies (also Slack pricing model is 
impossible for a community as ours), and we need to find a solution for that. 

Last days we were experimenting with @kilon again on use discord as a 
substitute and I find that for now it works really well and with a bit of work 
we can have all what you want: discord incorporated a search function (and they 
do not have the 10k limit) and we could do a bot that logs everything that 
happens there and stores that into gists (or whatever, but gists seems like a 
good idea). 

With this we would have enhanced the availability of those discussions (it 
remains the fact that immediate communication is worst organised than mails, 
but well… we need to try)

Esteban

> 
> Stephan
> 
> 


Reply via email to