> Am 15.01.2017 um 10:29 schrieb "itli...@schrievkrom.de" 
> <itli...@schrievkrom.de>:
> 
> I would give you many more "+" - if you wish - for your opinion:
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> 
> Another point I would like to mention: keep the source code locally or
> at least have an easy option to hold all source code locally.
> 
> I've seen so many times, that git or one of the other git repositories
> are down - that's a very critical point.
> 
But....that's always the case with git. You have always all the code plus 
history locally. Plus you can commit while being offline. Which is exactly one 
point where git excels. Even envy cannot do that if I understood it correctly.


> I would like to have a local repository, where I can import external
> packages and I work locally only.
> 
You can do that with metacello.

> I also have thought several times that it would be nice to have a SQLite
> database holding all sources/packages. How much easier life would be
> with that.
> 
I cannot see how using an in-memory sql database can make your life easier. To 
do what? 

Norbert
> Other than that: I prefer my simple server directory holding monticello
> packages - in the Gemstone/S area.
> 
> But I have to admit, that all the source code management stuff I've seen
> since ENVY in the Smalltalk community are pretty poor stuff - and even
> considering integrating git is not a step forward in terms of technical
> improvements, but only in terms of marketing and mainstream technology.
> 
> 
> Marten
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 14.01.2017 um 18:44 schrieb werner kassens:
>> Hi Dimitris,
>> i as a simple user tend to think about these things in simple terms: i
>> download a program, add something, upload my addition. lets take an
>> upload step, _one_ simple step with monticello: i upload something once
>> (git add), i upload it a second time (git commit), i upload it a third
>> time (git push), i try to upload it a fourth time (pull request), only
>> then i'm done (yes, there are possible shortcuts but so what). i'm sure
>> all this makes sense for the seasoned coder, but i certainly won't learn
>> that. <friendly grin> just as a small example how a user like me thinks
>> about this.
>> werner
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Marten Feldtmann
> 


Reply via email to