And I was just starting to wonder how far the weirdness would go ;-) Although I don’t know how much further you can go after "emojis over cookies over cookie monsters over garbage gravity grave”. :-P
-- Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I don’t mean to be rude! Please see http://emailcharter.org <http://emailcharter.org/> . Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile > On 31 Dec 2016, at 07:50, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > > Indeed, this is completely incoherent and looks automatically generated. > > I unsubscribed the address. > > Marcus > >> On 29 Dec 2016, at 21:14, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com >> <mailto:stepharo.s...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I suggest that we remove from the list this bot. >> >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Charlie Robbats <charlie.robb...@gmail.com >> <mailto:charlie.robb...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> 22 - priority queue vatting calls and send stacks: meta over emojis over >> cookies over cookie monsters over garbage gravity grave >> >> >> >> On 12/28/2016 2:22 PM, Charlie Robbats wrote: >> 19 - I am thinking about merging RS FEC with blockEn/Decoding with a 7-bit >> msgChunks into 8-bit blocks, or QoS determined. That along with non-secret >> 3-way finite field key agreement ratcheting and contract established >> scoping, would mean each transaction might be separately islolated from >> every other and the contract exchange includes trusted observation filtering >> capabilities, locally enforced through your prioritized trees of life, >> liberty & property, and also your knowledge of good and evil.
