"

ah, but this is fake (we have a bug shrinking the image).
real image is around 32m.
sources are also 32m.
changes are going to be zero on release.
"

You mean a bug increasing the image size, because otherwise I dont
understand you

"
how you get 43m in vm?
my VMs (all of them, linux, win and mac), are never bigger than 12m

cheers!
Esteban
"

aha you are correct , in the vm folder contains the pharoV5.sources.
This is very nice, 12 mb VM indeed, so there is a lot more room to compress
than I initially thought.

"Dimitris

Add some node project size with npm dependencies for some nice sizes too.
There it is also in terms of the number of files..."

from what I am reading online, npm projects tend to be around 100 mbs, but
still they give you no GUIs and no IDE.

so maybe its 100 mb NPM +  200 MB the browser (Chrome / Firefox) + 100 MB
the IDE plus some extra tools. But I am not NodeJS developer so I cannot
confirm this. I have experience with all the languages I mentioned but I
try to avoid the mess that is called "web development".

By the way , those numbers are not much diiferent from Pharo. All the
example I have that are 4-100x times bigger than Pharo offer also the
equivalent libraries set , tools etc. For example Java and Python libraries
are far larger than Pharo's. Most likely NPM is in that category.

The lesson from this story is If you want a powerful environment expect to
pay in hundreds of megabytes.  If don't care then you can go down to few
hundreds kbs . However judging from what is popular I think its safe to
assume that developers love large powerful environments and don't care
about size.

Pharo if we take into account the size of its library , IDEs , tools etc
100 MBs is pretty much a very reasonable size.

Now if we want to deliver a Lua-like Pharo version, with almost no VM, no
library, no guis, no IDE just for the purpose of embedding it as a
scripting engine, I am all for it.  I cannot say I need it, but why not.

But lets stop calling Pharo , fat, its not true and its rude. Pharo has
feelings too you know :D

Reply via email to