There is a scratch on cog vm as part of the standard raspbian distro.

Have you tried that?

> On Oct 18, 2016, at 09:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 18 Oct 2016, at 14:29, Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 17 Oct 2016, at 8:43 , Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Does a (faster) Cog VM for the Raspberry Pi actually exist ?
>>> 
>>> I tried comparing the latest OpenSmalltalk VM with some older ones, only to 
>>> find that they are all equally fast (slow actually):
>>> 
>>> pi@raspberrypi ~/Pharo $ ./pharo -nodisplay Pharo.image printVersion
>>> [version] 5.0 #50581
>>> 
>>> "http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharoS/raspbian/latest.zip";
>>> 
>>> pi@raspberrypi ~/Pharo $ ./pharo -nodisplay Pharo.image eval '1 
>>> tinyBenchmarks'
>>> '167429692 bytecodes/sec; 11160247 sends/sec'
>>> 
>>> "http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r3427/cogspurlinuxhtARM-15.33.3427.tgz";
>>> 
>>> pi@raspberrypi ~/Pharo $ ./products/phcogspurlinuxhtRPi/pharo -nodisplay 
>>> Pharo.image eval '1 tinyBenchmarks'
>>> '166992824 bytecodes/sec; 11337746 sends/sec'
>>> 
>>> "https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/download_file?file_path=cog_linux32ARMv6_pharo.cog.spur_201610142319.tar.gz";
>>> 
>>> pi@raspberrypi ~/Pharo $ ./products/phcogspurlinuxhtRPi/pharo -nodisplay 
>>> Pharo.image eval '1 tinyBenchmarks'
>>> '166992824 bytecodes/sec; 11337746 sends/sec'
>>> 
>>> That is no significant difference on a RPi 3, at all. Is this normal ? Am I 
>>> missing something ?
>>> 
>>> Thx,
>>> 
>>> Sven
>>> 
>>> PS: Just for reference, my Mac Book Pro is 10 times faster
>>> 
>>> 1 tinyBenchmarks  "'1323852617 bytecodes/sec; 174185794 sends/sec'"
>> 
>> Are you 100% sure you benched different VM's?
>> A stack VM (PharoS) getting the same results as a Spur VM 
>> (cog_linux32ARMv6_pharo.cog.spur_201610142319.tar.gz) is rather suspicious...
>> 
>> At least on my Pi3, the spur Cog VM gives  numbers around 250M 
>> bytecodes/160M sends....
>> which, while still "slow", is a decent bump in speed compared to what you're 
>> seeing.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Henry
> 
> Hi Henry,
> 
> That is exactly the kind of reference/experience I am looking for.
> Could you please point me to the exact download URL you downloaded ?
> I will happily test it ;-)
> 
> Thx,
> 
> Sven
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to