Why declare that as dead? It is there and is okay to use.
People can update it if needed. Why say this? That's not constructive, man. We need DB access. Pharo without DB access is going nowhere in the industry. Just had a pairing session w/ Doru and guess what? The data I need for Moose/Roassal usage is in a database. -_O Phil On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:29 PM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > Guillermo created Garage because the consortium asked and payed him to do > and I think that he did it well. Now Guillermo does not use any database > during his development and he is busy to work on many important tasks for > Pharo. > > I will ask Guillermo to declare Garage as dead and people should not come > and cry that DB is not well supported in Pharo. I never understood why the > code of UDBC was not pushed into Garage. > > Stef > > PS: So now people can tell me that I'm insulting torsten or whatever. Feel > free. I found the situation quite sad in fact and quite also discouraging. > > > > > Le 17/10/16 à 15:49, Esteban A. Maringolo a écrit : > >> 2016-10-17 8:12 GMT-03:00 Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name>: >> >>> Does anyone use Garage SQL drivers with sqlite in pharo >= 5? >>> >> Garage SQLite driver doesn't work on Pharo 5, the FFI API changed and >> Garage wasn't updated to use UFFI. >> You have to use Torsten version in UDBC. >> >> Gofer it >> smalltalkhubUser: 'TorstenBergmann' project: 'UDBC'; >> configuration; >> load. >> (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfUDBC) loadBleedingEdge. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Esteban A. Maringolo >> >> >> > > >
