Am 16.10.2016 14:35 schrieb "CodeDmitry" <dimamakh...@gmail.com>:
>
> I define Magic as "An opaque abstraction or an abstraction you think is
> opaque until you learn better.", to a beginner, everything is deeply
> Magical.
>
> That said, much of Smalltalk's opaqueness is not due to the language, but
> due to me being a beginner. I'm sure there's a way to actually force
sending
> a message to a dictionary via something like dict['at:put:']('foo', 'bar')
> but I am not familiar enough with Smalltalk to express it, so it feels
like
> the only way to send a message is via this multi-part message abstraction.
>You can always access the method dict directly to get a method and call "perform" or perform with arguments. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/How-do-Smalltalk-disambiguate-messages-tp4918946p4918966.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
