There has been some serious refactoring occuring in these specific bowels of the beast.
Phil On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ben. > > 2016-10-03 12:37 GMT+02:00 Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com>: > >> A further curiousity occurs to me. With this being executed 20 times >> a second or more, how can the active hand ever be anything other than >> the primary hand? >> Why isn't the active hand stored, all hands cycled through processing >> events, then the active hand restored?? >> > > Previous version of method was also with nil at the end: > > self handsDo: [:h | > ActiveHand := h. > h processEvents. > ActiveHand := nil > ]. > > Could you try your test on previous version of Pharo? > >
