On 26/09/16 17:57, stepharo wrote:
to me research vehicule could be perceived negatively.
There are a lot of people for which research vehicule is negative. In Crossing the Chasm, Geoffrey Moore describes well the difference between innovators, early adopters, early and late majority and laggards. This directly targets innovators and early adopters, who like challenges. In a legacy-code environment, you're likely to find more late majority and laggard attitude. There Wardley mapping is likely to be helpful to limit and control the scope of innovation. Pharo is the state of the art in software development, and we can only stay ahead by being a research vehicule. Stephan
