On 17 September 2016 at 13:26, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> I just tried the latest Makefile, but it does not work. Are you working on > it? Are you trying the book archetype ? (I'm trying not to do work stuff during weekends) > Interesting. However, given that we are anyway relying on Pharo, why are > the scripts not in Pharo? Reimplementing make is just diluting manpower closer to homeopathic levels, and pillar is already a proven cause of burnout. > > About the list of chapters in pillar.conf, for instance: if the document > has parts, then chapters are not a flat list; it's one of those things > where form is content is form… > > Yes, indeed. Looking deeper I realize that we could scavenge the > information out of +include+ directives from pillar files. This should be > enough to provide a tree index view of all files. > Check this issue; there are already a couple visitors that could be exporting this info, but they don't list everything, and don't output deps as makefile syntax https://github.com/pillar-markup/pillar/issues/130
