Nvm, I've misread it.
Ok, I will do it manually then, and submit a bug report. :)
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I get the exact same error when executing the script, I am running this on
> Pharo 5 (50760) btw.
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Mark Rizun <mri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> I tried to perform this transformation with RewriteTool and got the same
>> DNU.
>>
>>
>>> However when I tried to execute it I was met with DNU
>>> OrderedCollection>>parent:
>>>
>>> It seems that the @first/@second part are not matched properly.
>>>
>>
>> Actually they are matched properly, because if you try to put in
>> transformation part, for example, {``@first.``@second} everything works
>> fine.
>>
>>
>>> Any way to fix this? Or am I doing it wrong?
>>>
>>
>> I believe you are doing everything just fine. However, it is definately
>> the problem of RBParseTreeRewriter or something related to it.
>> Try to execute following code in playground and you will get the same DNU:
>>
>> | rewriter |
>> rewriter := RBParseTreeRewriter new replace: '| base |
>> base := {(#Department
>> ->
>> {``@first.
>> ``@second})}' with: '| base |
>> base := {#Department -> (Array with: ``@first with: ``@second)}'.
>>
>> (rewriter executeTree: (RBParser parseRewriteExpression: '| base |
>> base := {(#Department
>> ->
>> {(1 @ 255).
>> (Color lightMagenta)})}'))
>> ifTrue: [ rewriter tree asString inspect ].
>>
>> This code does exactly the same that RewriteTool should do when you put
>> all the parts into it.
>> Thus, I think, it is not a problem with the tool.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>
