Hi mark, it seems that your package: Regex-Core-MarkBratcher.39.mcz is not the inbox. if you have the package, then you can Copy(button in the monticello browser) it to the inbox, and try again.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Mark Bratcher <mdbra...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am trying to push a simple enhancement to Pharo50inbox on > smalltalkhub.com. I am running Pharo 5.0 (downloaded within the last > month) on Windows 10. > > I started from a completely clean image, made my small change (about 5 > lines in an existing Pharo 5.0 class), and I followed all of the directions > to contribute a proposed fix <http://pharo.org/contribute-propose-fix> > very carefully. All the steps went smoothly, as expected, until it came > time to pull and verify the slice. > > Here is a snapshot of my Monticello browser right BEFORE pushing > <http://i.stack.imgur.com/Zv2bZ.jpg> the suggested change slice. What is > listed as dirty are the SLICE itself (containing Regex-Core > (TheIntegrator.38)) and the package itself, listed separately, as dirty > (Regex-Core (TheIntegrator.38)). > > As indicated in the instructions, I highlighted the SLICE and did a Save > to the `http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo50Inbox/main` repository. > That went smoothly. After clicking save, Monticello showed > <http://i.stack.imgur.com/BYfVf.jpg> that the SLICE (with subpackage) and > the separately listed package were no longer marked dirty and version had > been bumped with my name associated (both now called, "Regex-Core > (MarkBratcher.39)"). > > The dialog that popped up after the save indicated that there is a > dependency on `Regex-Core (MarkBratcher.39)` which surprised me a bit, but > since I followed the instructions exactly, I wasn't concerned yet... > > When I tried to verify, I started with a clean image again (as recommended > in the instructions, opened Monticello, opened the Pharo50Inbox repository, > found and highlighted my slice, and clicked "Load". Then I got an error > that there was a missing dependency on the package: `Regex-Core > (MarkBratcher.39)`. I thought that package was integrated as part of the > SLICE. > > If I followed the linked instructions precisely, what am I missing? > > -- Bernardo E.C. Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America.
