Hi Vincent!
Thanks for the answer, I'll ask in the moose-dev mailing list what can be
done about it, and of course I've made an unit test that checks the bug is
gone :D

Cheers,
Diego.

2016-04-14 12:50 GMT-03:00 Blondeau Vincent <vincent.blond...@worldline.com>
:

> Hi Diego,
>
>
>
> First: welcome!
>
>
>
> RoelTyper makes indeed type inference for Moose (so based on a model of a
> source code, and support all kind of languages). I don’t know the status of
> this project but the Moose mailing list can help you on this (in cc).
>
>
>
> For type inference of only Smalltalk objects based on Pharo, I know that
> Pablo Tesone (in cc too) is working on it (maybe you should see
> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~pabloTesone/J2Inferer or
> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~pabloTesone/JUInferer).
>
>
>
> If you found a bug and have a fix, it is very nice ;)
>
> Did you make some regression tests ?
>
>
>
> To submit it, you should be a contributor of
> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~RMoD/RoelTyper or in the RMoD team project.
>
> You can try to ask the rights here or send your fileout as attachment.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vincent
>
>
>
> *De :* Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] *De la
> part de* Diego Orellana
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 14 avril 2016 16:53
> *À :* pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
> *Objet :* [Pharo-users] Hello World (found a RoelTyper Bug)
>
>
>
> Hi, Pharo Users!
>
>
>
> I'm starting to work on types in Pharo. To be more precise, I'd like to
> improve the RoelTyper (a package which "guesses" variable types in code).
> What suggestions do you have? I have some ideas and I'm currently working
> to find more, but it's always interesting to hear what the community has to
> say :)
>
>
>
> Oh, and by the way, I've found a bug in RoelTyper. I have a fix, but it
> seems that RoelTyper is a Moose thing, since it's not included in the
> vanilla Pharo image. Do you know where I could submit the fix?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Diego.
>
>
> !!!*************************************************************************************
> "Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage
> exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret
> professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir
> immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne
> pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité de Worldline ne pourra
> être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs
> efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout
> virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa
> responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un
> virus transmis.
>
> This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended
> solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this
> e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As
> its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability
> cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours
> to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that
> this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages
> resulting from any virus transmitted.!!!"
>

Reply via email to