Thank you. I was talking about your experience with Pharo :-)
But your description is nice also.

Regards,

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Alistair Grant <akgrant0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:46:02AM +0200, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Alistair Grant <akgrant0...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Also my first week with Pharo, and first week with Smalltalk in over 20 
>> > years.
>>
>> Congrats !
>> Tell us what is your experience until now ;-)
>
> I was the technical lead of a team that programmed with VisualWorks 2.5
> for several years in the 90's, porting it to VMS (VAX and Aplha) and
> writing a real-time graphical interface for monitoring and controlling
> the water distribution in one of the capital cities in Australia
> (Brisbane).
>
> The UI allowed users to build a library of widgets from basic shapes,
> e.g. valves, pumps, reservoirs, etc.  They could then be built up to
> schematics and attached to a real-time database, receiving events
> whenever a value changed.  E.g. valves would change shape or colour
> depending on whether they were open or closed, alarms would flash, a
> pump would show its flow rate, etc.
>
> We tested it receiving up to 1200 events per second (this was in the
> days when a 100MHz RISC processor was the best available (from memory)).
> All the graphics, event management and query optimisation were in
> Smalltalk, the database query execution and event delivery was in C (the
> database was in-memory and didn't support any query language, that all
> had to be done by the client).
>
> I left the company a year or so later.  I heard that it was replaced
> some years after I left, but I'm not sure when that happened.
>
> Cheers,
> Alistair
>



-- 
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

Reply via email to