> On 23 Mar 2016, at 15:37, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com> wrote: > > = anObject > ^ self class == anObject class > ... > > Most of the time, I've seen a test for #species, not class. This matters > because I have a custom ZnUrl subclass that I'd like to be equal to a ZnUrl > pointing to the same place.
Yes, that might be better. > While we're on the subject, I'm not an expert on hashing, but isn't it a > problem that ZnUrl>>#hash refers to #segment, which is not immutable? I don't think the mutability is a problem (collection's hash is similar), but apart from that, the hash implementation looks a bit weird (too simple). I am curious though why you subclasses ZnUrl. If you did not add structure but only behaviour you could have added some extension methods. > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/ZnUrl-Why-Require-Same-Classes-tp4886102.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
