Hi Peter and Stef, Sounds like you want a XML Digester? This is the one in Java: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-digester/ May be you want to check as reference. Cheers,
Hernán 2016-03-19 9:14 GMT-03:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr>: > We had great fun with peter because I could understand what I was looking > for around my xml importer. > Peter has the same problem so it was fun that we can talk and see the > light. > > What we learned in the process is that the pluggable behavior is nice but > limited > - type of matching > - you cannot match on children because you did not created them yet :) > > So what we plan to do and started (peter publish your code :) > - have a naive visitor on XMLNode > - use it to write a transform visitor that turns such some nodes into > special "domain nodes" > - Define a builder generating visit methods for an exporterVisitor > visiting the "domain nodes" > (this phase can be really automated) > - The exporterVisitor will let the programmer to define export rules > and create Pharo Object and moose objects. > > Peter if you find something useful in C# let me know. > Stef > > > Le 18/3/16 15:17, Peter Uhnák a écrit : > > I have a XML like this > > <packagedElement xmi:type="uml:Class" xmi:id="EAID_4A" name="DCEdge" > isAbstract="true"> > <!-- some stuff --> > </packagedElement> > <packagedElement xmi:type="uml:Association" xmi:id="EAID_46"> > <!-- some stuff --> > </packagedElement> > > and I would like to generate UmlClass and UmlAssociation classes for this. > > I could use XMLPluggableElementFactory, however that only allows me to > specify the target class only on the element's name, such as > > doc := (XMLDOMParser on: someXML) > nodeFactory: > (XMLPluggableElementFactory new > elementClass: GenericElement; > handleElement: 'packagedElement' withClass: UmlPackagedElement) > parseDocument. > > However I need better granularity, because I would like to have a > different class for 'packagedElement[xmi:type="uml:Class"]' and different > class for 'packagedElement[xmi:type="uml:Association"]'. > > Of course I could use double visitors (so use the Pluggable stuff to get > UmlPackagedElement) and then make another pass on it to get the final > classes, > > however I would prefer to have to wanted class directly without the need > to go through intermediate representation. > > Is there a way to do this? > > Thanks, > Peter > > >
