I propose this as an exercise.
Now I was not aware that we have doubleLinkedList in the system.
I do not get why DoubleLinkedList is packaged in System-Caching and not
Collections-DoubleLinkedList?
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17360/DoubleLinkedList-should-be-packaged-in-Collections-DoubleLinkedList
Stef
Le 5/1/16 02:50, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
Wouldn't it be better to improve the current (Double)LinkedList
instead of creating new ones? DLL had some improvements recently and I
am not aware that it's missing something.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu
<mailto:s...@stfx.eu>> wrote:
Hi Yann,
> On 04 Jan 2016, at 22:11, Yann Dubois <yann59.dub...@gmail.com
<mailto:yann59.dub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello World, Happy new year 2016 !
And to you too.
> I actually work on an integration of a double linked list on
Pharo and I have a little interogation.
> It's better to use recursivity or senquential algorithm ?
Recursive is often cleaner, sequential is often faster.
> Yann
There is already a (minimal) DoubleLinkedList in the image ...
Sven
