Hi Christophe,
Not yet, but this is definitely way to improve Spotter.
Thanks for the comment,
Juraj
--
Juraj Kubelka
8. 12. 2015 v 5:10, Christophe Demarey <christophe.dema...@inria.fr>:
> Hi,
>
> By the way, is it possible to have exact match now?
> At least, I expect to have expect match on the top of the result list.
> A simple use case,
> open Spotter
> search number
> dive into implementors category
>
> The exact matches are lost in the middle of hundreds of other selectors. This
> way, it is very difficult to find what you need.
> It is also why I always need to open a playground to be able to search all
> implementors of a selector. It is not do-able with spotter without an exact
> match.
>
> That said, I have to add that I really enjoy spotter and other GT tools :)
>
> Christophe
>
>
>> Le 8 déc. 2015 à 01:56, Juraj Kubelka a écrit :
>>
>>
>>> 7. 12. 2015 v 11:59, Peter Uhnak <i.uh...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> On 12/07, Juraj Kubelka wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> #<anything> is a category filter. Try #class, #instance, etc.
>>>
>>> Oh... right. I've been using this for long time, my brain just didn't
>>> connect the dots.
>>>
>>> In either case, once you dive in the category filter is no longer
>>> applicable.
>>> So normally I would do "#i selector", then dive in, and then filter it.
>>>
>>>> Then I have learnt that people are not aware of [...] any other kind of
>>>> wild-characters.
>>>
>>> People don't know what wild-chars are? I would understand that someone
>>> might be uncomfortable with regexps, because there are many variations, but
>>> wildchars…
>>
>> Well, some people asks for regular expressions, some people asks for
>> wild-characters, some people prefers other techniques.
>> In most cases people are satisfied with substring solution as it is right
>> now. In some special cases people thinks about more advance solution.
>> I believe that we should sort results according to relevance, e.g., if I
>> write open, then selectors called open should be first, then likely openOn:,
>> openWithSpec:, openVeryLongExplanation:, etc.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Juraj
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 20:40, Peter Uhnak <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> are there some wildcards in GTSpotter matching?
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently it searches anywhere in the (method) name, which makes it hard
>>>>> for shorter names, because it will match a lot of junk.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've also discovered (by accident), that I can use '>>#selector' to
>>>>> anchor the start of the selection. ('#selector' for some reason doesn't
>>>>> work).
>>>>> But I would like to also search by a simple ? (any character), * (any
>>>>> characters) wildcard. Is that possible?
>>>>>
>>>>> Additionally constraining it from the end would be also nice.
>>>>> For example I want to look through #default methods, however 90% of the
>>>>> matches will be junk, so I would like to write '#default$' and it will
>>>>> not match '#defaultIcon', etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this possible?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Peter
>>>
>>
>>
>
