> On Nov 20, 2015, at 17:36, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 20/11/2015 21:16, Juraj Kubelka a écrit : >> If I remember well, ZIP in Pharo supports only one file (one stream >> of data). There is no support for directories. At least, when I have >> intended it some time ago, I failed. > > No, zip in Pharo works with directories. However I think the zip Filesystem > doesn't work which means you have to manipulate the zip members with the zip > API, not as a filesystem.
Can you give me an example? The file has about 30.000 files (compressed less then 50 MB). I am not sure if it is good idea to manage this inside of Pharo image. > >> I do not stand on using *.tar.gz, but I have not found better >> solution for my setup: Directory is compressed on Linux machine and >> should be extracted on any machine by using local tools. >> >> Do I miss some feature in Pharo? > > I think you do ;) Better :-) Cheers, Juraj > > Thierry > >> Cheers, Juraj >> >> >>> On Nov 20, 2015, at 12:35, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Why not use Zip files? There already exists direct support for that >>> (hopefully it still works). >>> >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 20, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Juraj Kubelka >>>> <juraj.kube...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> is there a way to extract *.tar.gz files using plain Pharo 5 >>>> image? Without loading extra packages? It could be OS dependent. >>>> Maybe calling external linux tar application. I have done it with >>>> ExternalUnixOSProcess object, but it is not standard part of >>>> Pharo 5. >>>> >>>> Thanks for any comment. Juraj >>> >>> -- www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Innovation comes in the least expected form. That is, if it is >>> expected, it already happened." >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
