The same type of fluid interface is available in Glamour. That is why this quick prototyping has to make it in the base layer, not just in the libraries that are built on top (like Glamour or Spec).
Doru > On Nov 10, 2015, at 10:16 PM, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote: > > yes the dynamic building of spec guis is definetly better than morphic > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:11 PM Johan Fabry <jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote: > > No worries, no offense taken (at least on my part). I could just not resist > posting a 3-liner that showed you that some things do work nicely in Spec :-) > >> On Nov 10, 2015, at 17:50, Dimitris Chloupis <kilon.al...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just for the record when I say I dont like something is a mere stating of an >> opinion and in no way a chance to offend or downgrade the hard work that >> went to those libraries. Afterall most of the time I dont even like my own >> code. There is no right or wrong here, just personal taste. >> >> And I have recommended Spec to several people because its still the simpler >> way to build GUIs on the go. And I am grateful for the Morphic cleanup and >> Rubrics extra functionality. For the record my days with Delphi are long >> gone and I would not leave Pharo to go back to Delphi in a million years. I >> love Pharo because the things I like are far more than the things I dislike. >> Keep up the awesome work. You made Pharo my new home and I am here to stay >> :) >> > > ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- > > Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry > PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of > Chile -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing should have the right to be different."
