Why does it show that QA has only conf. for pharo 5 if it also has one for Pharo 4?
Uko > On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I made another pass on catalog web-site. This time I just enhanced a bit the > styling… still a lot to do but is looking better and better: > http://catalog.pharo.org (you might need a force refresh) > > But in fact, this announce is just an excuse to remember you to enhance your > configurations with catalog information as described here: > http://catalog.pharo.org/catalog/note-for-developers > Also, if your configuration is proved to work on Pharo 3, 4 or 5, please copy > your configuration into that repository, to avoid it to appear under > “Unstable” tag. > > The Catalog is just as good as the information it provides: there is A LOT > of very good packages no one will ever notice (like Aconcagua, for example), > that does not provide *any* information and therefore they will never be used > :( > > PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS! > > cheers, > Esteban
