2015-10-06 15:28 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > > On 06 Oct 2015, at 15:23, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de> wrote: > > > > 2015-10-06 13:46 GMT+02:00 Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no>: > >> >> On 06 Oct 2015, at 1:33 , Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de> wrote: >> >> >> >> 2015-10-06 11:57 GMT+02:00 Werner Kassens <wkass...@libello.com>: >> >>> On 10/06/2015 09:09 AM, Nicolai Hess wrote: >>> >>>> > Since Object has almost 500 methods whatever I will start typing >>>> Object/TClass/TBehavior/... will have a list of answers... >>>> >>>> I think this is difficult, even though this classes are big and you >>>> don't use most of the methods, >>>> >>>> >>> Hi Nicolai, >>> imagine that code-completion is a game and the computer wins, if the >>> user mostly uses the first few proposals. perhaps one could program several >>> different heuristics, that decide, what the user wants. depending on the >>> user choices, the weights for these heuristics get updated accordingly and >>> then the choices get sorted with those weights. this way the >>> code-completion could adapt to the way each user works? >>> >> >> >> Yes this would be nice, but it is not an easy task. >> >> >>> werner >>> >>> >> >> I thought we already had something like that... >> http://www.squeaksource.com/OCompletion/ >> > > I can not load it in a recen pharo image. > Is it used in recent versions of squeak? > > > OCompletion is already in the image (since Pharo 2.0). > if you check your settings, under "Code Completion”, Controller… it should > say NOCController. >
Funny, I always thought the NOC-Classes are some kind of "Old" NEC-Classes. > Is a lot better than older NECController, but still far from good enough. > Some more information on this? What is missing. > > Esteban > > > > > >> >> Cheers, >> Henry >> > > >
