Re: [Pharo-users] Pillar for 30 gone the way of the dodo on the CI

[Marcus Denker]

Is CI an archive? 

> On 01 Oct 2015, at 10:05, Peter Uhnak <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In Jenkins you specify configuration matrix (versions of pharo versus type 
> (development, stable, ...)).. So it will run development for all versions, 
> even pharo 30 (which is now permanently broken)
> From: Stephan Eggermont <mailto:step...@stack.nl>
> Sent: ‎10/‎1/‎2015 9:47 AM
> To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org <mailto:pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Pillar for 30 gone the way of the dodo on the CI
> 
> On 01-10-15 09:41, Stephan Eggermont wrote:
> > On 30-09-15 19:57, Ferlicot D. Cyril wrote:
> >
> >> We removed the Pillar job for Pharo 3 because we introduced an new
> >> feature not backward compatible.
> >
> > Why is that a reason to remove the build? You have a configuration,
> > don't you?
> 
> I would suggest: move to a separate job that is run much less often
> and doesn't keep so many old artifacts. That makes it easier to get old 
> stuff running again.
> 
> Stephan
> 
> 
>