> On 18 Aug 2015, at 17:20, Pablo R. Digonzelli <pdigonze...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I can colaborate. I do not know if i have the time and technical skills to do 
> it alone, but for shure i can colaborate.
> I think magma will be a very interesting option for object persistence in 
> pharo.
> I am currently working with garage and glorp and i suffers the innecesary 
> complexity and other bad things thet persistence layer introduce in 
> developing pharo apps.

have you checked voyage? (to work with a MongoDB)… it will avoid all the pain 
of using a relational database. 

Esteban

ps: But yes, I do believe having magma would be cool too. 

> 
> Pharo
> 
> 
> Ing. Pablo Digonzelli 
> Software Solutions 
> IP-Solutiones SRL 
> Metrotec SRL 
> 25 de Mayo 521 
> San Miguel de Tucumán 
> Email: pdigonze...@softsargentina.com 
> pdigonze...@gmail.com 
> Cel: 5493815982714
> 
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> De: "Torsten Bergmann" <asta...@gmx.de>
> Para: "Any question about pharo is welcome" <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
> CC: step...@stack.nl, steph...@free.fr, hila...@drgeo.eu, "Pablo Digonzelli" 
> <pdigonze...@gmail.com>
> Enviados: Martes, 18 de Agosto 2015 10:26:44
> Asunto: Fwd: [ANN] Magma 1.5
> 
> Stephan Eggermont wrote:
>> It is possible, and it needs someone who can deal with low-level 
>> details. Magma has its own mailing list. Chris has repeatedly said he'd 
>> be willing to help out, but is not willing to be the Pharo port maintainer.
> 
> I asked Chris directly and you can find his answer here on the magma list:
> 
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/magma/2015-August/001955.html
> 
> As ever it requires someone to move this forward to make it happen.
> But as there was an initiative with Magma 1.3 for Pharo 1.3 already it does 
> not 
> seem impossible.
> 
> Also - as Stef already pointed out - community services like CI could be used
> to maintain it once an initial up to date port was done. 
> 
> Bye
> T.
> 


Reply via email to