Give me couple of minutes to make answer, please.

2015-08-08 13:14 GMT+03:00 H. Hirzel <hannes.hir...@gmail.com>:
> Mainly the answer to the question: How do I use the experimental exporter
> class?
>
>
>
>
> On 8/8/15, H. Hirzel <hannes.hir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, this is what I realized when looking at your code in Tabular.
> >
> > This is a good basis to build upon. I started adding some versions to
> > http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss/Tabular.html
> >
> > mainly adding comments and grouping method into protocols.
> >
> > Your test cases are useful.
> >
> > May I ask you to add some comment to the exporters subpackage?
> >
> > Hannes
> >
> >
> > On 8/8/15, Vincent BLONDEAU <vincent.blond...@polytech-lille.net> wrote:
> >> I think you can improve Tabular to generate DOCX files. It is the same
> >> file
> >> standard than XLSX.
> >>
> >> Vincent
> >>
> >> -----Message d'origine-----
> >> De : Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] De la
> part
> >> de
> >> H. Hirzel
> >> Envoyé : samedi 8 août 2015 08:56
> >> À : Any question about pharo is welcome
> >> Objet : Re: [Pharo-users] MSOffice DOCX generation?
> >>
> >> I found Tabular
> >>
> >> http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss/Tabular.html
> >>
> >> which is for Spreadsheets files. It is useful as an example for creating
> >> something similar for DOCX files.
> >>
> >> On 8/8/15, H. Hirzel <hannes.hir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> A similar library but for Java
> >>>
> >>> http://www.docx4java.org/trac/docx4j
> >>>
> >>> On 8/7/15, H. Hirzel <hannes.hir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hello
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there a library like for Pharo to generate DOCX files?
> >>>>
> >>>> Something like this
> >>>> https://docx.codeplex.com/
> >>>> DocX is a .NET library that allows developers to manipulate Word
> >>>> 2007/2010/2013 files, in an easy and intuitive manor. DocX is fast,
> >>>> lightweight and best of all it does not require Microsoft Word or
> >>>> Office to be installed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Hannes
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to