Uko2 wrote >> On 31 Jul 2015, at 16:00, Paul DeBruicker < > pdebruic@
> > wrote: >> >> It seems like its not testing for the right conditions any more and >> therefore not finding any messages that are implemented but not sent. >> >> >> I think this and the problem I was having the other day is from removing >> the use of the RBSmallLintContext class from checking criitcs issues. >> Why did you decide to do that? > > > This happened during case 15724[1]. Shouldn’t be hard to fix but requires > tests. > > As for context removal: Because we have 100500 contexts in Pharo and > everyone uses it’s own. Another thing is that “why should every rule care > about the context?”. I wan to check a single class, and the rule needs > some kind of context. I don’t have a context I have a class. > > Another issues that we still have is that you cannot see whether your > method/class is violating a rule. You have to go to a result, which is a > context, query something… > > [1]: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/15724/ Thanks for the pointer to the bug. I'll take a look. Re contexts, there are 539,103 Arrays in Pharo and everyone uses its own. Are there plans to remove them? Did you consider adding hooks #methodCheckWithContext: & #checkClassWithContext: for those that worked and used contexts so that for the ones that profited from the use of contexts could continue without continuing to be poorly named methods? For querying/viewing is there a way contexts could be made polymorphic with rules? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Does-RBImplementedButNotSent-result-in-any-critics-for-any-of-you-tp4840424p4840453.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
