Hi, thanks for all these explanations. I tested the versions you mentioned below with both Pharo and Squeak.
Squeak-GUI (4.6) seems still to be three times faster than Pharo's GUI (5.0) - but actually it's at least a Pharo version which has an acceptable speed. Marten Am 05.07.2015 um 21:24 schrieb Attila Magyar: > Hi Marten, > > Currently I'm using this this vm from here > > http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r3395/cogspurlinuxhtARM-15.26.3395.tgz > > with the latest Pharo 5 spur image from here > > http://files.pharo.org/image/50/latest-spur32.zip > > As far as I know, spur is a new memory manager but I'm not familiar with the > details. > > There is also a stack vm that works with ordinary images, but it lacks JIT > compilation therefore a lot slower than cog. > > Attila > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Situation-Raspberry-PI-and-Pharo-Squeak-tp4835873p4835876.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Marten Feldtmann
