Hi Stef,
Le 02/07/2015 23:18, stepharo a écrit :
Hi thierry
mark will arriv at Lille saturday for a month. He is working with
Camille on a new tree pattern matching algorithm
A generic algorithm or one tied to the RB AST?
because we lost energy on RB matcher.
What was your analysis?
Thanks,
Thierry
Stef
Le 1/7/15 21:29, Thierry Goubier a écrit :
Le 01/07/2015 21:16, jtuc...@objektfabrik.de a écrit :
You mean RewriteRules? I was planning to do that, for this exact reason.
But you know how things go when there is a long list of priorities.
I know it saves a lot of time and makes porting so much more safe, but
it needs an up-front investment in time...
Yes, rewrite rules. Mark Rizun GUI attempts are a very interesting
direction to handle that...
Oh, by the way, Mark, if you're listening... I did what you were
trying to do by changing AST nodes positions in Pharo, but on a SmaCC
based AST for another language. I have to admit that you were right to
try to do it that way, but that the Pharo/RB AST infrastructure wasn't
suitable whereas SmaCC infrastructure is.
Thierry
